论坛风格切换切换到宽版
  • 160阅读
  • 0回复

Why did IBM choose Stellar? [复制链接]

上一主题 下一主题
离线jiumi
 

分享到微信朋友圈
打开微信,点击底部的“发现”,
使用“扫一扫”即可将网页分享至朋友圈。
如果您现在使用手机,请将这个2维码存入相册,再打开微信,扫一扫,点击相册。

Stellar(XLM ) is an entirely decentralized consensus network with a built-in decentralized exchange that supports all kinds of cryptocurrencies and assets.

It seems nothing special about stellar from the profile, but why did IBM choose it rather than other Gateaway-Coin? It must have its advantage. It is obvious that Ripple prevails in the battle of Stellar vs Ripple about the agreement. A financial agreement is worthless without banks, users and international ports. However, Ripple is far-sighted, because it has joined NACHA and recruited Chris Larsen and Prosper from E-loan. Whats more, Ripple obtained the usage agreement of the German bank, Fidor. Adapting to the current financial system, Ripple succeeded, but why did IBM choose stellar?

Stellar Network is developed based on Ripple, which was improved according to the technology of Bitcoin and Ripple, especially the consensus mechanisms and verification algorithms. The node performance to operate the Stellar network is improved, and the requirement of node resource are low. Among the improvements, the biggest change is the support algorithm of the stellar payment system, SCP, which claimed to be the safest Byzantine algorithm.

Stellar blockchain  was chosen is not an accident. LeTV cooperated with stellar is the beginning of cross-border payment. Except for Stallar, it is said Ripple was also chosen by bank as a Gateaway Coin, which reveals that Gateaway Coins are more popular from the perspective of bank.
本帖提到的人: @CryptocurrencyR
评价一下你浏览此帖子的感受

献花
快速回复
如果您提交过一次失败了,可以用”恢复数据”来恢复帖子内容
 
安全校验: 答案:168 登录会员无需填写, 游客显示3组IP
上一个 下一个